top of page

Iruni Kalupahana, JadeTimes Staff

I. Kalupahana is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Europe

 
Image Source: Haiku Deck
Image Source: Haiku Deck

Early Life and Education


Nicolaus Copernicus was born on 19 February 1473 in the town of Torun in Poland to a wealthy merchant family. His education was taken up by his uncle, Lucas Watzenrode, a high ranking cleric and future Prince Bishop of Warmia, following the death of his father when he was about ten years old. Copernicus attended the University of Cracow, where he developed an interest in mathematics, astronomy, and cartography. Later, he traveled to Italy to study medicine and law at the University of Bologna, Padua, and Ferrara. While in Bologna, he studied with the renowned astronomer Domenico Maria Novara, who encouraged him to critically examine the Ptolemaic system. Copernicus also studied Greek and Latin, which allowed him to read ancient astronomical works in their original language.


Influences and Early Observations


Copernicus drew on ancient texts, particularly the works of Ptolemy, whose geocentric model had been widely accepted for over 1,400 years, and Aristarchus of Samos, who had proposed a Sun centered universe around the 3rd century BCE. In contrast to his predecessors, Copernicus sought to correct inconsistencies in the Ptolemaic system, which required complex epicycles to explain planetary movements. His observations, including a notable lunar occultation of the star Aldebaran in 1497, made him believe that Ptolemy's model did not accurately describe celestial mechanics. Apart from astronomy, Copernicus was a skilled mathematician, physician, economist, and diplomat, which drew him towards the methodical and analytical approach to scientific issues.


Origin of the Heliocentric Model


While working as a canon of a church in Frombork, Copernicus continued his astronomical studies in solitude. Around 1514, he wrote Commentariolus, an unpublished treatise outlining his heliocentric theory. In this system, the Sun, and not Earth, was placed at the center of the universe with planets, including Earth, revolving in circular orbits around it. He also proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis daily, which explains the motion of the stars. His mathematics rendered Ptolemy's epicycles redundant, presenting a more elegant and mathematically accurate model of planetary motion. Despite the revolutionary nature of his work, Copernicus hesitated to publish his findings due to potential criticism from scholars and the church. Instead, he continued to refine his model for nearly three decades.


Publication of De Revolutionibus


Finally, after years of delay, Copernicus published his magnum opus, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres), in 1543, the year he passed away. The book, which was dedicated to Pope Paul III, gave detailed mathematical explanations in support of heliocentrism and contained a preface (added by Lutheran theologian Andreas Osiander) that explained the heliocentric model as merely a theoretical method of calculation and not a literal model of the world. Copernicus's reluctance to publish earlier was justified, as the book brought about interest and uproar. Though it still used circular planetary motion, later adjusted by Johannes Kepler's theory of elliptical orbits, De revolutionibus initiated the Copernican Revolution, significantly changing astronomy and motivating subsequent scientists.

Image Source: Mike Hanlon
Image Source: Mike Hanlon

Impact on Science and Astronomy


As much as Copernicus's heliocentric hypothesis lacked proof of observation back then, it laid the foundation for modern astronomy. He influenced directly Johannes Kepler, who used precise data from Tycho Brahe to formulate the three laws of planetary motion, which proved that planets move in elliptical paths. Galileo Galilei, using the newly invented telescope, provided the decisive evidence for heliocentrism by discovering Jupiter's four largest moons, the phases of Venus, and lunar surface details on the Moon, contradicting the idea of a perfect and unchanging cosmos. Isaac Newton later based his work on these discoveries by creating the laws of motion and universal gravitation, mathematically confirming the Sun centered universe. Copernicus's concepts not only revolutionized astronomy but also redefined humanity's view of humanity's position in the cosmos.


Challenges and opposition


The Copernican system encountered vigorous opposition from scientific as well as religious circles. Several scholars were intensely devoted to Aristotelian cosmology where Earth was at the center of the universe. The Catholic Church, which initially had interest in Copernicus's thoughts, subsequently condemned heliocentrism, especially after Galileo's telescopic observations made in the 17th century. The Church formally placed De revolutionibus on the Index of Forbidden Books in 1616, forbidding its circulation. Protestant reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin similarly opposed the heliocentric scheme, citing quotes from the Bible which seemed to support geocentrism. Not until advances had been made in observational astronomy and Newtonian physics in the 18th century was heliocentrism widely accepted.


Legacy and Recognition


Nicolaus Copernicus is now regarded as one of the greatest scientists in history. He did more than advance astronomy, though he created nascent economic concepts, too, such as Gresham's Law, which is a description of debasement effects on currencies. He has many ways in which he is remembered, such as having the Copernican Principle within cosmology named after him, wherein Earth is not the center of the universe. The Copernicus crater on the Moon, the element Copernicium (atomic number 112), and the European Space Agency's Copernicus Programme are all named after him. His remains, lost for centuries, were discovered in 2005 and reburied with honors in 2010 in Frombork Cathedral, where he did most of his work.


Nicolaus Copernicus's heliocentric theory revolutionized humanity's understanding of the universe. By challenging what was long thought, he opened the door for advances in physics, astronomy, and space exploration to come. Using observation, mathematics, and reason as an example is the definition of advancing science. Five centuries after his death, his impact remains, reminding us of the power of challenging entrenched dogma in pursuit of knowledge. His achievements formed the groundwork for the Scientific Revolution, revolutionizing the direction of human history and our perception of the cosmos forever.

Iruni Kalupahana Jadetimes Staff

I. Kalupahana is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Australia

 
Image Source: Peapix
Image Source: Peapix

Geographical and Natural Significance


Mount Wellington, which is known locally by its Indigenous name kunanyi, is Tasmania's symbolic natural landmark. At a height of 1,271 meters above sea level, the mountain looms over the city skyline of Hobart, the state capital. Snow on its summit even in summer, Mount Wellington has glorious views over the city as well as over the Derwent estuary. Its rugged landscape is dominated by dolerite columns, or the Organ Pipes, adding to its scenic appearance. The mountain boasts diverse flora and fauna, and thus a holiday destination of choice for nature enthusiasts, climbers, and photographers.


Geological Formation and Historical Development


The geological formation of Mount Wellington dates back over 40 million years when tectonic activity separated the Australian continental shelf from Antarctica. The mountain was developed by extreme volcanic activity, giving rise to the distinctive rock formation. The earliest European sighting of the area was by French and English explorers in the late 18th century, and the mountain underwent several name changes before it was formally named after the Duke of Wellington in 1832. The mountain played a significant role in the development of Hobart as a source of fresh water and later as a site for meteorological observation.


Cultural and Indigenous Heritage


There is a strongly linked history for the Aboriginal Palawa people to Mount Wellington, or its original title of kunanyi. The mountain has been culturally important and sacred to Indigenous Australians for centuries as a source of sustenance and ceremony. In order to acknowledge its Indigenous heritage, dual naming was formally approved by the Tasmanian government in 2013, which increased its cultural significance. European settlement came with displacement and environmental changes, yet efforts still continue to uphold and honor the Indigenous past of the mountain by preserving it through conservation and educational initiatives.


Tourism, Recreation, and Accessibility


Mount Wellington is an extremely well visited mountain for locals as well as visitors, offering varied outdoor activities. A good standard of road facilitates the journey up to the peak, where observation shelter offers all around views of the region. There are a number of hiking trails like the Zig Zag Track and Pinnacle Road that provide scope for adventure tourists of all skill levels. The mountain also attracts rock climbers to its Organ Pipes rock formation and is popular with mountain biking and nature walks. Its mercurial weather patterns, however, require visitors to be ready for immediate changes, such as strong winds and snow.


Challenges, Conservation, and Future Prospects


Although a popular tourist destination, Mount Wellington faces environmental and development issues. Cable car plans have been controversial with the public, as conservationists and residents of the area vehemently disagree with altering the natural integrity of the mountain. Climate change and bushfires also pose huge risks to its ecosystem. Conservation remains an ongoing concern, safeguarding indigenous species, minimizing human footprints, and maintaining the balance between tourism and environmental preservation. Being a beloved landmark, Mount Wellington is a part of Tasmania's natural and cultural heritage that requires constant preservation to ensure its beauty for future generations.

Iruni Kalupahana JadeTimes Staff

I. Kalupahana is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Russia-Ukraine war

 
Image Source: Karah Rucker
Image Source: Karah Rucker

The European Union leaders have settled on a huge increase in military expenditure because of growing uncertainty about U.S. dedication to European security. Recent statements by U.S. President Donald Trump, including his welcoming of Russia, withdrawal of U.S. support for Ukraine, and disruption of long standing cooperative frameworks, have caused the European allies to doubt. To address these concerns, the 27 EU leaders agreed on proposals to loosen budgetary restraints to allow member states to increase their military spending. The European Commission has been tasked with finding new ways to facilitate increased defense spending by all EU member states.


The EU executive calculates that an estimated 650 billion euros can be freed up under these proposals. In addition, the European Commission put forward a 150 billion euro loan package to help countries purchase new military equipment. The step has been hailed as helping to boost Europe's defense capabilities amid the growing security threat from Russia. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the defense investment plan as a "watershed moment" for Ukraine and Europe, as the continent needs to be capable of defending itself from external threats.


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy praised Europe for the backing, stating that increased military spending would help in the growth of Ukraine's defense industry. Ukraine, which has lower production costs for weapons compared to other European nations, is well positioned to benefit from the EU's investment in increased defense spending. Zelenskyy contrasted the support of European leaders with his more tense meeting with President Trump in Washington just a few days earlier, and he noted the importance of European unity in Ukraine's ongoing conflict with Russia.


Despite the EU's attempts, there remain significant disagreements on how to approach military strategy and defense expenditure. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a long time fan of Trump and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, took exception to parts of the summit's pro Ukraine stance. However, the majority of EU leaders reaffirmed that there could be no discussion on Ukraine without its direct involvement and that the European nations must be represented at any security discussions. This is reflective of the EU's ongoing inability to manage its own security independent of U.S. influence.


In the face of heightened Russian aggression, France has been leading the charge for a more autonomous European defense policy. French President Emmanuel Macron has proposed that France's nuclear deterrent can be a cornerstone to protect Europe from Russian aggression, a proposal which has been met with resistance from Moscow. Nevertheless, countries like Poland and the Baltic states have embraced this proposal. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has also made a statement, suggesting that London and Paris will work together on a peace deal with Ukraine, suggesting further European led attempts at ending the war with Russia. These attempts at diplomacy have been rebuffed by Russian leaders, who view such suggestions as fueling the conflict.

bottom of page