top of page

G. Mudalige, Jadetimes Staff

G. Mudalige is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Technology & Innovation

 
AI and the Future of Hiring: Psychological Impacts on the New Generation
Image Source : Forbes

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the hiring process, reshaping how employers assess candidates and how job seekers navigate the competitive market. From AI-powered resume screenings to automated interview processes, recruitment is becoming more efficient. However, the psychological effects on the new generation entering the workforce cannot be overlooked. As AI takes a more active role in hiring, young professionals face both opportunities and challenges that influence their confidence, mental well-being, and career development.


One of the most significant psychological impacts of AI-driven hiring is the shift in candidate evaluation. Traditional interviews and human-led assessments are being replaced by AI-driven tools that analyze facial expressions, speech patterns, and even personality traits. While this promises a more objective selection process, it also raises concerns about fairness and emotional stress. Job seekers may feel anxious about being evaluated by an algorithm rather than a human, fearing that their unique qualities and soft skills may be overlooked. This can lead to increased job search-related stress and self-doubt, particularly among younger candidates who are still building their professional identity.


AI-powered hiring also changes how candidates prepare for job applications. With AI screening resumes before they reach a human recruiter, applicants must optimize their resumes with keyword-rich content tailored for algorithms. This shift can create psychological pressure, as young professionals may feel they are competing against a system rather than being evaluated on their true potential. The need to "game" AI screening systems can lead to frustration and a sense of disconnection from the hiring process, reducing confidence in their own skills and experiences.


Another psychological challenge is the lack of human interaction in AI-driven recruitment. Virtual interviews conducted by AI remove the personal connection that candidates traditionally build with recruiters and hiring managers. For many young job seekers, especially those just entering the workforce, this lack of direct feedback can be disheartening. Without human reassurance, candidates may struggle with feelings of uncertainty about their performance and suitability for a role. The absence of emotional cues from recruiters can also make it harder for job seekers to assess company culture and workplace dynamics, leading to potential job dissatisfaction in the long run.


However, AI in hiring also brings psychological benefits. The automation of recruitment processes eliminates unconscious biases, offering a fairer playing field for candidates from diverse backgrounds. By focusing on skills and qualifications rather than subjective factors, AI can enhance inclusivity and provide equal opportunities to all job seekers. This can boost confidence among young professionals who may have previously faced bias due to gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background.


Moreover, AI-driven hiring creates opportunities for candidates to develop adaptability and technological proficiency. The new generation is becoming more tech-savvy, learning how to navigate digital job platforms, optimize their online presence, and leverage AI-driven career development tools. These skills enhance their employability and resilience, helping them stay competitive in an evolving job market.


The key to managing the psychological impact of AI in hiring lies in balance. Employers should integrate AI tools while maintaining a human touch in recruitment, ensuring candidates receive personalized feedback and emotional support. Job seekers, on the other hand, must develop emotional resilience, adaptability, and digital literacy to thrive in an AI-dominated job market. With the right approach, AI can revolutionize hiring without compromising the psychological well-being of the new generation entering the workforce.

Douglas Kimathi,Jadetimes Staff

D. Kimathi is a Jadetimes news reporter covering political and business updates

 
House Speaker Slams Kremlin
Image Source: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

In a fiery statement that reverberated across Washington, House Speaker Maria Lopez declared that the United States will never align itself with Russia, directly challenging recent diplomatic noise suggesting a potential thaw under Trump’s leadership. Speaking before a packed congressional press conference, Lopez accused the Kremlin of undermining global democracy, spreading disinformation, and fueling wars of aggression, especially in Ukraine. Her remarks stood in sharp contrast to the more ambiguous stance adopted by former President Donald Trump, who has previously hinted at “exploring better ties” with Moscow if elected again.

Sharp Rebuke to Trump’s Soft Spot for Putin

Lopez’s forceful condemnation appeared aimed not just at the Kremlin but also at Trump’s foreign policy instincts, which have often leaned toward accommodating Putin. Throughout his political career, Trump has repeatedly called for improved US-Russia relations, at times questioning the value of NATO alliances and sanctions against Moscow. However, Lopez and a growing bipartisan coalition in Congress argue that any reconciliation with Russia under its current leadership would betray American values and weaken global stability.

Ukraine War Remains a Flashpoint

The ongoing war in Ukraine remains the most contentious point between Washington and Moscow. While Congress has funneled billions in aid to Kyiv, Trump’s recent comments suggesting a “quick peace deal” with Putin raised alarms across Capitol Hill. Lopez warned that such a deal could sacrifice Ukrainian sovereignty and reward Russian aggression, a position she described as “morally unacceptable”. Her speech reaffirmed that America’s commitment to Ukraine’s defense will not waver, regardless of political shifts in the White House.

Congress Demands Tougher Sanctions on Russia

In her remarks, Lopez urged Congress to strengthen existing economic sanctions on Russia, particularly targeting energy exports, banking networks, and oligarch wealth stashed abroad. According to Lopez, Russia’s war machine is being funded by energy profits, and cutting off this revenue stream could cripple Moscow’s ability to sustain aggression. Lopez also called for a global crackdown on Russian disinformation, which she claimed has infiltrated Western media and online platforms, poisoning public discourse with lies and propaganda.

Moscow’s Defiant Response

The Kremlin wasted no time firing back, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov dismissing Lopez’s remarks as “Cold War hysteria”. Lavrov insisted that Russia seeks stable relations with the US but accused Congress of clinging to outdated hostility. However, analysts argue that Moscow’s ongoing cyberattacks, election interference, and support for rogue regimes make any meaningful partnership with Washington virtually impossible under current circumstances.

A Defining Moment for US Foreign Policy

Lopez’s uncompromising stance sets the stage for a major showdown over the future of US-Russia relations, especially if Trump returns to office. As Congress asserts its authority on foreign policy, it sends a clear signal that the legislative branch will resist any softening toward the Kremlin. This battle over America’s stance on Russia could become a defining issue in the 2025 election cycle, shaping global alliances, the fate of Ukraine, and the credibility of US leadership in the world.

Douglas Kimathi,Jadetimes Staff

D. Kimathi is a Jadetimes news reporter covering political and business updates

 
Prime Minister Slams Trump’s ‘Brutal’
Image Source: AP

The political fallout from Donald Trump’s fiery clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has now sparked a fierce international backlash, with French Prime Minister François Bayrou openly criticizing Trump’s handling of the meeting. In a blunt statement, Bayrou described Trump’s behavior as “brutal and undiplomatic,” warning that such confrontations could further destabilize Europe at a time when unity against Russian aggression is vital. The French leader’s words reflect growing frustration in Europe over what many see as Trump’s reckless foreign policy theatrics.

Paris Stands Firm Behind Ukraine

France’s strong defense of Zelenskyy comes as no surprise, given Paris’ longstanding commitment to supporting Ukraine’s fight against Russian invasion. Prime Minister Bayrou reaffirmed that France stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Kyiv, calling Trump’s public humiliation of Zelenskyy both unnecessary and counterproductive. French officials argue that dividing allies in such a public forum only emboldens Vladimir Putin, who has long sought to fracture the Western alliance supporting Ukraine.

Diplomatic Fallout Spreads Across Europe

Bayrou’s condemnation is just the first wave of what could become a wider European backlash against Trump’s erratic diplomacy. Already, officials in Berlin and Brussels are privately expressing concern that Trump’s confrontational tactics could undermine NATO cohesion. With European nations already bearing the brunt of Ukraine aid, the sense that the US might be abandoning its leadership role has triggered fears of strategic drift, leaving Europe to pick up the pieces alone.

France Presses for United European Response

Prime Minister Bayrou also called for a special emergency session of European leaders to discuss the implications of the Trump-Zelenskyy clash. France wants to accelerate European defense coordination, recognizing that the continent can no longer rely on consistent US support under Trump’s unpredictable leadership. This push reflects France’s broader vision of European strategic autonomy, an idea that gained momentum after Trump’s first presidency and has now roared back to life.

Trump’s History of Clashes with Europe

Trump’s abrasive treatment of European allies is nothing new. During his previous term, Trump repeatedly clashed with leaders like Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel, criticizing NATO spending and even questioning the alliance’s relevance. Bayrou’s response to the latest debacle underscores how Trump’s second coming is already reviving old transatlantic tensions, threatening the fragile unity Europe has worked so hard to maintain since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

A Defining Moment for Western Unity

As France leads the charge in defending Zelenskyy, the broader question becomes whether other European leaders will follow suit or seek to mend ties with Trump in hopes of preserving US security guarantees. For now, France is drawing a clear line, signaling that European solidarity with Ukraine is non-negotiable—regardless of who occupies the Oval Office. The next NATO summit could become the ultimate stress test for Western unity, as France’s defiance and Trump’s unpredictability collide on the world stage.

bottom of page