top of page

Chethana Janith, Jadetimes Staff

C. Janith is a Jadetimes news reporter and sub-editor covering science and geopolitics.

 

The Doomsday Clock is a metaphor that signifies how close humanity is to self-destruction, primarily due to the threats of nuclear weapons and climate change.


The hands of the clock are set by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a group formed by Manhattan Project scientists at the University of Chicago, who were instrumental in building the atomic bomb but protested its use against people.


Currently, the Doomsday Clock is set at 89 seconds to midnight.

Image Source: (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
Image Source: (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

What are the origins of the Doomsday Clock?


The Doomsday Clock symbolizes how precariously close we are to annihilating ourselves with dangerous technologies of our own creation. It serves as a warning of the metaphorical “minutes to midnight” that humanity has left. Updated annually by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, its purpose is to alert the public and inspire action.


When established in 1947, the Doomsday Clock's setting reflected the threat posed by nuclear weapons, which the Bulletin scientists regarded as the greatest danger to humanity. In 2007, the Bulletin began to include catastrophic disruptions from climate change in its deliberations for setting the clock's hands.


The furthest setting of the clock was 17 minutes to midnight in 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the signing of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. Previously, the closest setting was two minutes to midnight - first in 1953, when the U.S. and Soviet Union both tested thermonuclear weapons, and then in 2018, citing “a breakdown in the international order” among nuclear actors and the persistent inaction on climate change.


In 2025, the clock moved to its closest setting ever: 89 seconds to midnight.


How was the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists founded?


Most members of the Manhattan Project, the secret government mission that created the first atomic bomb, were unaware of what they were building. However, the scientists knew, and some had reservations from the beginning.


Physicists Leo Szilard and Albert Einstein wrote to President Franklin Roosevelt in 1939, alerting him to the potential of an atomic bomb and their suspicions that Germany might be able to construct one. Six years later, in June 1945, Szilard, along with Nobel laureate James Franck and other Manhattan Project scientists, signed a cautionary document known as the Franck Report, which they sent to the U.S. Secretary of War. They advocated for a public demonstration of the weapon in an uninhabited area to pressure Japan into surrendering. When the document failed to gain traction, they circulated a second petition against the use of the weapon, signed by nearly 70 Manhattan Project employees.


Despite their efforts, in August 1945, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


Upon learning that the bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima, Szilard called it “one of the greatest blunders of history” (in a note on stationery from the University of Chicago Quadrangle Club to Gertrud Weiss, the professor of medicine whom he later married).


Szilard and many other Manhattan Project scientists quickly convened to discuss how to educate the public about science and its implications for humanity. By September, they had formed the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists of Chicago - later shortened to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists as membership grew. Their mission was clear: “to equip the public, policymakers, and scientists with the information needed to reduce man-made threats to our existence.”


“For the first time in modern history, scientists were saying that it was necessary to make judgments about what to do with their inventions,” remarked John A. Simpson, a young UChicago scientist who had worked on the Manhattan Project and served as the first chairman of the Bulletin.


For 75 years, the Bulletin has continued as an independent, nonprofit organization, publishing a bimonthly magazine. According to its website, its mission is to “gather a diverse array of the most informed and influential voices tracking man-made threats” to inform the public and the world at large.


How was the Doomsday Clock created?


The first few Bulletins were mimeographed collections of articles. However, as the publication expanded, its editors decided to appeal to a wider audience with a designed cover. Bulletin member Martyl Langsdorf, an artist primarily known for her abstract landscapes, agreed to create an illustration.


Responding to the urgency conveyed in the meetings, she designed a minimalist yet memorable clock with its hands set at seven minutes to midnight, partly because it “looked good to [her] eye.” Since then, the Bulletin has used the clock to depict the existential threats facing humanity. A full timeline of the clock’s hand placements is available on the Bulletin’s website.


Where is the Doomsday Clock located?


The Doomsday Clock is located at the Bulletin offices at 1307 E. 60th St., in the lobby of the Keller Center, home to the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.


How is the Doomsday Clock set?


Until his death in 1973, Bulletin editor Eugene Rabinowitch decided whether the clock hand should be moved. As a leader in the international disarmament movement, he actively engaged with policy experts and scientists worldwide, using these discussions to set the clock and explain his reasoning in the Bulletin’s pages.


Today, the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board sets the clock. This group of 18 experts, with diverse backgrounds in policy, diplomacy, military history, and nuclear science, meets twice a year to discuss events, policies, and trends. They consult widely with their colleagues across various disciplines and seek the views of the Bulletin’s Board of Sponsors, which includes multiple Nobel laureates. Each year, the clock’s position is announced in late January.


The Bulletin currently recognizes three major threats to civilization: climate change, nuclear proliferation, and “disruptive technologies,” including bio- and cybersecurity. “Each of these threats has the potential to destroy civilization and render the Earth largely uninhabitable by human beings,” it states. Its public dashboard constantly tracks these threats.

An inaccurate harbinger of doom. Image Source: (HE68/Shutterstock)
An inaccurate harbinger of doom. Image Source: (HE68/Shutterstock)

What happens when the Doomsday Clock hits midnight?


When originally launched, the clock’s countdown referred to a potential exchange of nuclear weapons, which would have catastrophic consequences for humanity and the planet.


Today, the threat from nuclear weapons remains, but another significant threat is climate change. “It’s much harder to have a kind of before and after midnight clear sense of what that means [for climate],” former director Rachel Bronson told the University of Chicago’s Big Brains podcast. “That being said, this metaphor is important because for the climate, there are tipping points that you can’t come back from. And you won’t feel those effects until years out, but it’ll be very difficult if even possible to recover from.”


However, Bulletin members have consistently emphasized that the clock is not intended to instill fear but rather to inspire action. Board member Prof. Robert Rosner likens the clock to “the canary in the coal mine,” prompting miners to take quick action to save their lives.


“The number of ways in which we walk blithely into Armageddon is very high. But that’s something all of us can help address,” said Daniel Holz, UChicago professor of astronomy and astrophysics and chair of the Science and Security Board. “If we act now, we might avoid some of the worst, civilization-threatening outcomes. Agitate for change! It’s not too late.”


“Past experience has taught us, even during the most dismal periods of the Cold War, we can as a people come together to address our challenges,” said Rosner, former chair of the Bulletin’s science and security board and the William E. Wrather Distinguished Service Professor in Astronomy & Astrophysics and Physics at the University of Chicago. “It is now high time to do so again.”



G. Mudalige, Jadetimes Staff

G. Mudalige is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Technology & Innovation

 
Mysterious Tunnels Believed to Be Designed by Leonardo da Vinci Discovered Beneath Sforza Castle
Image Source : AFP

A remarkable discovery beneath Milan’s historic Sforza Castle has reignited discussions about Leonardo da Vinci’s influence on Renaissance military architecture. Researchers from the Politecnico di Milano have identified underground passageways that closely resemble those depicted in a sketch by Leonardo from around 1495. The findings suggest that these tunnels, which had long been speculated about based on historical records, were likely intended for defensive military use during times of siege. This revelation sheds new light on the hidden history beneath one of Italy’s most famous medieval landmarks.


The research, conducted between 2021 and 2023, utilized advanced ground-penetrating radar and laser scanning technology to digitally map the underground structures. Initially, the team aimed to document the well-known subterranean passage beneath the Ghirlanda, the outer defensive wall of the castle. However, their survey unexpectedly revealed a second, secret tunnel running parallel to the first, just three feet beneath the surface. Experts believe this passageway was a concealed route for soldiers, allowing them to move undetected and defend the fortress from within.


Leonardo da Vinci, widely recognized for his contributions to art and science, was also a visionary in military engineering. While his exact role in the construction of these passageways remains uncertain, the discovery reinforces his deep connection to the architectural evolution of the Sforza Castle. Commissioned by Duke Ludovico Sforza in the late 1400s, Leonardo spent considerable time at the castle, designing defensive structures, weapons, and even contributing to the property’s artistic embellishments. His sketches, now linked to these tunnels, reveal his strategic approach to fortification and warfare.


In addition to the military passageways, researchers detected tunnels leading towards the Basilica of Santa Maria delle Grazie, where Ludovico Sforza’s wife is buried. Historical records suggest that the grief-stricken duke may have commissioned this tunnel for private access to the basilica. The newly discovered underground rooms further indicate the presence of additional, as yet unexplored, subsurface structures. Given that the original castle complex was nearly six times larger than its present-day footprint, researchers suspect that much more remains hidden beneath the surface.


The Sforza Castle has undergone significant transformations over the centuries, including extensive demolitions during the Napoleonic wars and restoration efforts in the late 19th century. Despite these changes, the recent findings prove that crucial remnants of the past still survive underground. The discovery underscores the importance of using modern technology to explore historical sites without invasive excavation, preserving valuable cultural heritage while unlocking secrets from centuries past.


Leonardo’s influence on Renaissance architecture extended beyond theoretical designs. His sketches often served as conceptual blueprints, inspiring advancements in structural engineering. While some of his architectural ideas remained hypothetical, the striking resemblance between his drawings and the Sforza Castle’s underground tunnels raises compelling questions about his direct involvement in their creation. Further investigation is required to determine the extent of his contribution, but the discovery undeniably strengthens his legacy as a pioneer of military strategy and defensive engineering.


As technology continues to uncover hidden layers of history, this finding highlights the significance of preserving cultural and architectural heritage. The tunnels beneath Sforza Castle serve as a testament to the ingenuity of the Renaissance era and the enduring impact of Leonardo da Vinci’s genius. With ongoing research and technological advancements, more groundbreaking discoveries may still be waiting beneath the surface, offering invaluable insights into the past.

G. Mudalige, Jadetimes Staff

G. Mudalige is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Technology & Innovation

 
Microsoft Announces the Shutdown of Skype in May 2025
Image Source : TechGeek

Microsoft has officially announced that Skype, one of the most influential video-calling services of the early internet era, will be discontinued in May 2025. Launched in 2003, Skype revolutionized online communication by allowing free voice and video calls over the internet, connecting people across the globe. Microsoft acquired Skype in 2011 for $8.5 billion, integrating it into its suite of products, including Windows, Xbox, and Office. Despite its groundbreaking role in the digital communication landscape, Skype has struggled to maintain its relevance in recent years as competitors like WhatsApp, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams gained dominance.


The closure of Skype marks the end of an era for millions of users who relied on the platform for personal and professional communication. Many users have shared nostalgic memories, recalling how Skype helped them maintain relationships, whether through long-distance calls with loved ones or virtual meetings with colleagues. Before the rise of smartphones and other communication apps, Skype was a pioneer, eliminating costly international call charges and making video conferencing accessible to all. Users remember the platform as a game-changer that felt like magic at the time, bringing pixelated yet meaningful conversations to families, friends, and businesses worldwide.


Despite its initial success, Skype faced growing competition from newer platforms that offered faster, more user-friendly, and mobile-optimized experiences. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and FaceTime became preferred choices for casual video calls, while Zoom and Microsoft Teams dominated the professional market. A controversial redesign in 2017, which attempted to imitate Snapchat’s features, further alienated users. The interface changes were widely criticized as unnecessary, complicating an already functional service. Microsoft’s decision to prioritize Teams over Skype became apparent when Windows 11 was launched in 2021 without Skype as a default app, a move that signaled the beginning of the end for the once-popular platform.


The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the shift to Microsoft Teams, which saw widespread adoption in corporate environments and online learning. As remote work and virtual meetings became the norm, Teams emerged as the preferred communication tool, offering advanced features such as meeting hosting, calendar integration, and file sharing. Unlike Skype, which was primarily designed for casual video calls, Teams provided a more comprehensive collaboration platform suited for businesses and large organizations. With Teams' increasing popularity, Skype's relevance continued to decline, leading Microsoft to consolidate its communication services under a single platform.


In an official statement, Microsoft confirmed that existing Skype users can transition to Teams while retaining core features such as one-on-one and group calls, messaging, and file sharing. Users also have the option to export their chat history, contacts, and call logs before the service shuts down. For paying customers, Microsoft has assured that any remaining subscription services will remain active until their next renewal period. The move is part of Microsoft's broader strategy to streamline its offerings and focus on more advanced communication solutions.


Skype’s closure signifies a major shift in the digital landscape, as new platforms continue to reshape the way people connect. While it may no longer be the dominant force it once was, Skype’s legacy remains significant, having paved the way for modern video calling and virtual collaboration. As the tech world evolves, Microsoft’s decision to integrate its communication services into Teams reflects the growing demand for more versatile and business-oriented platforms in an increasingly digital-first world.

bottom of page