top of page

Iruni Kalupahana JadeTimes Staff

I. Kalupahana is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Russia-Ukraine war

 
Image Source: Sergey Guneev
Image Source: Sergey Guneev

Putin Open to Talks on Ukraine Conflict


Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday expressed readiness for talks to end the ongoing war in Ukraine. He said Russia was ready for negotiations and compromise, if Ukraine was also ready for that, Russia's state television quoted.


Putin made clear that what he wanted was a durable peace treaty, not some temporary ceasefire, and that any negotiations should return to the preliminary agreements made in Istanbul during the first weeks of the war. He also said any agreement would require a legitimate Ukrainian authority meaning the parliament or a re elected President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to sign it.


Progress and Challenges in the War


Putin noted the territorial gains that had taken over about a fifth of Ukraine. They continue with active operations in strategic spots. While calling the combat operation complex, he maintained that the most important objective is reached for the Russian forces.


In that sense, the Russian leader claimed that Russia is not weaker after the conflict. It was actually much stronger, he underlined. He voiced his regret for not starting the military operation sooner and also admitted the economic consequences of the war, including the first signs of overheating and inflation in the Russian economy.


Global Implications and Military Strategy


The war has brought relations between Moscow and the West to the breaking point, similar to those during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Though Putin had justified the conflict as one against NATO's expansion, he highlighted Russia's latest military capabilities, including hypersonic "Oreshnik" missiles.


He even said another test could be staged to challenge Western air defenses. While there is talk of peace, the world remains vigilant over the unfolding situation as leaders such as Zelenskiy question Putin's intentions and Russia's place in the world.

Vithanage Erandi Kawshalya Madhushani Jade Times Staff

V.E.K. Madhushani is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Political.

 
Image Source : Chris Mason

A Crisis of Expectations: Labour’s Misstep with Waspi Women

 

The thorny issue of compensation for women affected by changes to the state pension age has come back to haunt Labour, as campaigners feel betrayed by the government's refusal to offer payouts. While it was never an official promise in Labour’s election manifesto or the Conservative Party's, for that matter campaigners, including the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi), were left with the impression that Labour was on their side. 

 

This impression was amplified by statements and actions from Labour leaders, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, and Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who were photographed alongside Waspi campaigners, voicing their sympathy for their plight. However, when it came to the question of financial compensation, Labour followed the same path as their Conservative predecessors, citing fiscal constraints as the barrier. 

 

Broken Trust and Political Fallout

 

The outrage from Waspi campaigners has ignited accusations of betrayal and hypocrisy. These feelings echo far beyond pension campaigners, contributing to a broader erosion of trust in political leadership. In a time of growing cynicism toward government promises, this latest controversy risks further disillusioning an electorate already skeptical of Westminster's ability to deliver on its commitments. 

 

The optics of this situation have added to Labour's woes, with its front bench visibly subdued during the announcement. The cancellation of the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners earlier this year already left many reeling, and this latest decision compounds the perception that Labour’s economic policies may not align with the expectations of their voter base. 

 

Economic Growth Goals Undermined by Shrinking Economy

 

Labour's governing mission to stimulate economic growth has stumbled out of the gate. The UK economy is shrinking, and discontent is spreading among various groups, from farmers angered by Budget decisions to businesses and charities struggling with increased employers’ National Insurance contributions. 

 

This discontent has opened a window of opportunity for smaller political parties like Reform UK. Led by Nigel Farage, the party has seized the moment to position itself as an alternative to the two major political players. Farage’s depiction of his trip to Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago as positive and uplifting stands in stark contrast to the bleak mood surrounding British politics. Reform UK, with just five MPs, is already viewed with concern by senior figures in both Labour and the Conservatives. 

 

The Challenge of Delivering in the Modern Era

 

Governments across Western democracies face mounting difficulties in delivering tangible results for their citizens, and the UK is no exception. Labour’s resounding general election victory, which many hoped would usher in a period of calm and progress, has instead been met with fractious political battles and an impatient electorate. 

 

As 2025 looms, political dissatisfaction and economic challenges are expected to dominate the agenda. Labour’s ability to navigate these stormy waters will determine whether it can secure long-term trust or if the window will remain open for insurgent parties to further disrupt the political landscape. 

 

In the end, the question remains whether Labour and indeed any party can prove capable of governing effectively in an era defined by economic challenges and political disillusionment. For now, the Waspi campaigners’ outrage serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of unmet expectations.



Vithanage Erandi Kawshalya Madhushani Jade Times Staff

V.E.K. Madhushani is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Innovation.

 
Image Source : Graham Fraser

AI Feature Missteps: The Case of a Misleading Headline

 

A leading journalism advocacy group, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), has urged Apple to discontinue its generative AI-powered notification summarization feature after it inaccurately attributed a false headline to a high-profile news story in the United States. 

 

The controversy arose when Apple Intelligence, an AI-driven tool that summarizes and groups notifications, created a misleading headline regarding Luigi Mangione, the murder suspect in the killing of Brian Thompson, a healthcare insurance executive in New York. The AI incorrectly made it appear that Mangione had shot himself, a claim that was not reported by any media outlet. Mangione has since been charged with first-degree murder. 

 

This incident prompted a formal complaint from a major media organization, and RSF has now joined the call for Apple to reconsider the feature, citing the risks posed to journalistic integrity. 

 

Generative AI Sparks Concerns About Misinformation

 

RSF, an organization dedicated to defending press freedoms, expressed serious concerns over the reliability of AI tools in disseminating accurate information. Vincent Berthier, RSF's head of technology and journalism, stated, "Generative AI relies on probabilities, not facts, making it an unreliable source for producing accurate news. Apple must act responsibly by discontinuing this feature, which undermines media credibility and endangers the public's right to accurate information." 

 

The journalism group described the incident as proof that current AI tools are not yet mature enough to handle the complexities of news summaries without risking harm to the reputation of publishers. 

 

Apple’s Silence and Ongoing Issues

 

Apple has yet to comment on the growing criticism. The feature, Apple Intelligence, was introduced in several markets recently, including the UK. The system groups and summarizes notifications for users to reduce interruptions, but concerns have grown over its accuracy. 

 

While the AI summaries grouped together other articles accurately—such as updates on South Korea’s president Yoon Suk Yeol and the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria—the glaring error regarding Mangione has overshadowed these functions. 

 

Apple has not confirmed whether it has addressed complaints from affected media outlets or how it plans to improve the system. 

 

Other Missteps Highlighted

 

The Mangione case isn’t the only instance of AI-generated inaccuracies. On November 21, Apple Intelligence reportedly summarized three New York Times articles in a single notification, inaccurately stating that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been arrested. In reality, the report was about an International Criminal Court warrant for Netanyahu, not an actual arrest. 

 

Journalist Ken Schwencke flagged the error online, further adding to concerns about the AI’s reliability. The New York Times has refrained from commenting on the incident. 

 

How Apple Intelligence Works

 

Apple Intelligence offers grouped notifications designed to reduce interruptions, currently available on iPhones using iOS 18.1 or later, as well as select iPads and Macs. The feature includes an option for users to report concerns about misleading summaries. 

 

While its primary aim is convenience, the tool has faced scrutiny for inaccuracies not only in news summaries but also in emails and text messages. Critics argue that the feature’s flaws reveal broader challenges with deploying generative AI in sensitive applications like news reporting. 

 

Call to Action

 

The uproar has put pressure on Apple to reevaluate the feature's future, as well as to implement stricter safeguards to ensure the integrity of news summaries. Media organizations and advocacy groups are united in their demand for more accountability in the deployment of AI tools in journalism and public communication.



bottom of page