By G. Mudalige, Jadetimes Staff
G. Mudalige is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Technology & Innovation
In a landmark demonstration, over 40,000 people gathered outside New Zealand’s Parliament in Wellington to protest a controversial bill aiming to reinterpret the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, a foundational document between British colonizers and the Māori people. This massive event marked the conclusion of a nine-day hīkoi, or peaceful march, that traveled across the nation, highlighting growing discontent over the proposed legislation.
The Treaty Principles Bill, introduced by a junior member of the Act political party, seeks to legally redefine the principles of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi. Critics argue the bill threatens Māori rights, with many viewing it as an attempt to dilute protections for the indigenous population. Supporters, however, contend the treaty needs modern reinterpretation to reflect New Zealand’s increasingly multicultural society.
The demonstration on Tuesday was one of the largest in New Zealand's history, surpassing significant protests like the 5,000-strong land rights march in 1975 and the 2004 hīkoi advocating for shore and seabed ownership. The hīkoi culminated at the Beehive, New Zealand’s Parliament building, where thousands, many draped in Māori flags, joined in solidarity. The Māori Queen, Ngā Wai hono i te pō, led the delegation, symbolizing the profound cultural and historical significance of the protest.
The protest highlighted the growing divide over the bill, which has yet to pass its second reading. While Prime Minister Christopher Luxon of the National Party has stated the legislation is unlikely to become law, the proposal has already sparked nationwide debate. Luxon emphasized his party’s opposition, stating, “We don't think through the stroke of a pen you go rewrite 184 years of debate and discussion.”
David Seymour, leader of the Act party and the bill’s sponsor, has defended the proposal, arguing it aims to ensure equality among all New Zealanders, regardless of ancestry. Seymour, who has Māori ancestry, contends that prioritizing heritage in legal principles perpetuates division rather than unity. However, his stance has faced criticism from Māori leaders, activists, and allies, who see the bill as an erosion of indigenous rights.
The march brought together diverse groups, including Māori, Pacific Islanders, and non-Māori supporters, united in opposition to the bill. Participants expressed fears of losing hard-fought rights and emphasized the importance of preserving the treaty's historical intent. For many, the hīkoi was not just a protest but a legacy-building moment, representing the need to safeguard the cultural identity and future of Māori communities.
Inside Parliament, the bill’s discussion has been met with significant resistance, including a powerful haka performed by Māori MPs in protest. The performance, which quickly went viral, underscored the emotional and cultural weight of the issue. Activists and Māori leaders have accused the coalition government of attempting to undermine New Zealand's reputation as a leader in indigenous rights.
As the conversation surrounding the Treaty Principles Bill continues, the protests serve as a stark reminder of the tensions between tradition and modern governance. For many New Zealanders, the hīkoi symbolizes a broader struggle for justice and equality, resonating far beyond the immediate political debate. The fight to preserve the Treaty of Waitangi’s integrity is far from over, with six months remaining until the bill’s next reading.
