top of page

Japan's Proposed App Store Law Set to Enhance Innovation and Competition

By T. Jayani, JadeTimes News

 
Japan's Proposed App Store Law Set to Enhance Innovation and Competition
Image Source : SOPA Images

Discover how Japan's proposed App Store Law Set is poised to enhance innovation and competition, fostering a fairer and more competitive environment.


Japanese developers have long faced arbitrary and anticompetitive restrictions imposed by the two dominant mobile operating system companies. The proposed law would equip the government with tools to swiftly address and halt abusive behaviors, enabling developers to compete on a level playing field and benefiting both Japanese businesses and consumers.


With smartphones serving as the primary internet access point for billions globally, the mobile ecosystem is critically important. However, this market is currently distorted by the outsized influence of just two companies.


After thorough analysis, Japan and other governments have determined that Apple's and Google's app stores engage in practices that hinder competition and innovation. These companies impose monopoly rents on app developers and compel small developers to share private data, which is then used to develop competing integrated apps. They also restrict developers from offering user friendly features, such as in app audiobook purchases, by mandating the use of their own payment systems.


Governments, including Japan, have recognized that intervention is necessary to curb these abuses and restore market competition. Apple and Google, anticipating the impact on their control and profit margins, have opposed Japan's proposed law. Similar opposition strategies have been observed in the European Union and the U.K. The Diet should remain steadfast against these arguments.


Critics of the bill argue that Japan's mobile ecosystem is already flourishing and that the dominance of Apple and Google reflects a healthy market. They claim the regulations are unnecessary given Japan's strong and innovative tech sector. However, these arguments overlook the essential nature of competitive markets, which rely on consumer choice and multiple viable options. History demonstrates that intervention against dominant platforms can unleash innovation, as seen with the U.S. actions against Microsoft 30 years ago.


The U.S. intervention against Microsoft's dominance in the 1990s paved the way for new innovations and consumer choices, ultimately benefiting companies like Apple and Google. Today, the shift from PCs to mobile devices has placed Apple and Google in a similar gatekeeper role. Despite widespread recognition of their anticompetitive practices, they have remained largely unchallenged.


To foster a thriving mobile economy, laws like the one under consideration in Japan are essential. The prolonged monopolistic practices by Apple and Google underscore the need for new measures beyond existing competition laws.


The EU and the U.K. have already implemented similar measures. In the U.S., the Open App Markets Act received bipartisan support in a Senate committee, and the Justice Department is pursuing a case against Apple for anticompetitive conduct.


The necessity and benefits of such legislation are clear, and countries worldwide are taking action. In response, Apple and Google have resorted to scare tactics, claiming that loosening their control would compromise user privacy and security. However, competition is the best guarantee for prioritizing these concerns.


It's crucial to remember that Apple and Google do not represent the U.S. Many American developers and companies stand to gain from such regulatory measures, just as they did from the actions taken against Microsoft years ago. By passing this legislation, Japan would set a global standard for digital market fairness, encouraging other nations to follow suit. This move would reinforce its alignment with countries that prioritize innovation, consumer choice, and fair competition.


The Diet's proposed app store law is a visionary step toward promoting innovation, consumer choice, and fair competition in the digital market. By diminishing the dominance of Apple and Google, the legislation would cultivate a more open and dynamic ecosystem, enabling innovation to flourish and consumers to benefit.

4 views0 comments
bottom of page