G. Mudalige, Jadetimes Staff
G. Mudalige is a Jadetimes news reporter covering Technology & Innovation
The United Kingdom and the United States have opted out of signing an international declaration on artificial intelligence (AI) at the Paris AI Action Summit, a decision that has sparked global debate. The agreement, signed by 60 nations, including France, China, and India, outlines commitments to an "open," "inclusive," and "ethical" approach to AI development. However, the UK and US cited concerns over national security, global governance, and regulatory overreach as reasons for their refusal to endorse the statement.
US Vice President JD Vance addressed world leaders at the summit, emphasizing that excessive regulation could stifle innovation at a crucial time. He reaffirmed the Trump administration's commitment to a "pro-growth AI policy," positioning the US as a leader in AI development without restrictive oversight. His remarks contrasted sharply with French President Emmanuel Macron, who defended the need for regulatory frameworks to ensure AI safety, transparency, and sustainability. Macron argued that global AI rules were essential to balance innovation with ethical considerations, warning against unchecked technological advancement.
The UK government, which previously championed AI safety under former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, justified its stance by stating that the declaration lacked clarity on global governance and national security implications. A government spokesperson reiterated that while the UK agreed with much of the declaration, it felt that certain aspects were insufficiently addressed. Despite this decision, the UK signed other agreements at the summit related to AI sustainability and cybersecurity, signaling a selective approach to international AI commitments.
The refusal to sign the AI declaration has raised concerns among AI policy experts. Andrew Dudfield, head of AI at fact-checking organization Full Fact, warned that the UK's decision could undermine its credibility as a leader in ethical AI development. Meanwhile, Michael Birtwistle from the Ada Lovelace Institute questioned the government's rationale, stating that it was difficult to pinpoint specific elements of the declaration that would conflict with UK interests. Critics argue that by stepping away from a global consensus on AI governance, the UK risks isolating itself from key discussions shaping the future of the technology.
However, industry leaders in the UK have welcomed the decision, with the trade body UKAI supporting a more flexible approach to AI governance. Tim Flagg, UKAI’s chief executive, stated that while environmental responsibility is important, the AI industry must balance sustainability with its growing energy demands. He suggested that the government's refusal to sign the statement signaled a willingness to explore pragmatic solutions while maintaining close AI collaborations with the US.
The summit also marked the first time AI's environmental impact was formally addressed in an international agreement. As AI's energy consumption continues to rise, experts have warned that its power usage could soon rival that of small nations. The agreement prioritizes making AI development "sustainable for people and the planet," an issue that remains at the forefront of global discussions on technology and climate change.
The AI summit took place against the backdrop of increasing trade tensions between the US and Europe. President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports has further complicated diplomatic relations. The UK, in particular, faces the challenge of balancing its ties with both the US and the European Union, navigating economic and technological policies in a rapidly evolving global landscape. As AI continues to reshape industries, the divergence in regulatory approaches between major economies could have long-term implications for the future of artificial intelligence worldwide.
Comments